Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revision | ||
resource:conf:ranking [2024/01/31 07:18] – created romangol | resource:conf:ranking [2024/02/02 02:28] (current) – romangol | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | G.O.S.S.I.P 安全学术会议排行榜(2023) | + | ====== |
- | === | + | |
- | + | | |
- | Here we go again!在一月的最后一天,我们正式发布了去年也就是2023年度的安全学术会议排行榜!今年的排行榜有哪些变化呢? | + | |
- | + | | |
- | 首先,今年的会议排行榜上,入围的参赛选手有一些变化,今年我们邀请了两位新成员——CANS和SOUPS加入,而TrustCom和IFIP Sec则退出了今年的竞争。此外,在网络公开数据集上并没有查询到ACM CODASPY、SecureComm和SRDS的论文投稿数,因此录用率无法计算。下面是我们录得的原始数据(欢迎大家勘误): | + | |
- | + | ||
- | ## 原始数据 | + | |
- | + | ||
- | | | 投稿数量 | 录用数量 | 录用率 | PC人数 | | + | |
- | | ----------- | -------- | -------- | ----- | ------ | | + | |
- | | USENIX Sec | 1444 | 422 | 0.29 | + | |
- | | ACM CCS | 1222 | 235 | 0.19 | 461 | | + | |
- | | IEEE S& | + | |
- | | NDSS | 574 | 94 | 0.16 | 104 | | + | |
- | | ESORICS | + | |
- | | ACM AsiaCCS | 429 | 74 | 0.17 | 101 | | + | |
- | | ACNS | 263 | 53 | 0.20 | 74 | | + | |
- | | ACSAC | 246 | 59 | 0.24 | 121 | | + | |
- | | DSN | 240 | 47 | 0.20 | 106 | | + | |
- | | RAID | 213 | 50 | 0.23 | 67 | | + | |
- | | ICICS | 210 | 44 | 0.21 | 126 | | + | |
- | | Euro S& | + | |
- | | Inscrypt | + | |
- | | SOUPS | 147 | 33 | 0.22 | 54 | | + | |
- | | ACM Wisec | 134 | 34 | 0.25 | 74 | | + | |
- | | PETS | 106 | 27 | 0.25 | 175 | | + | |
- | | ISC | 98 | 29 | 0.30 | 42 | | + | |
- | | ISPEC | 80 | 35 | 0.44 | 48 | | + | |
- | | NSS | 64 | 21 | 0.33 | 73 | | + | |
- | | CANS | 54 | 25 | 0.46 | 46 | | + | |
- | | ACM SACMAT | + | |
- | | DIMVA | 43 | 13 | 0.30 | 56 | | + | |
- | | ACM CODASPY | -- | 27 | -- | 57 | | + | |
- | | Securecomm | + | |
- | | SRDS | -- | 23 | -- | 46 | | + | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | ## PC人均顶会 | + | |
- | + | ||
- | 按照惯例,首先考察一下各家会议的程序委员会实力强弱。2023年的各大会议中,ACSAC的程序委员会表现非常亮眼,超越了打破了四大安全会议的程序委员会 | + | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | 四大安全顶会在这一项指标上依然是称霸榜单,可是榜单的后面就发生了较大的变化——去年的第五名RAID一下子掉出了前八,取而代之的是去年在排名第九的DIMVA;去年排名19的老牌安全会议DSN今年排名上升3位,同时在这项指标上大幅缩小了和其它会议的差距~ | + | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | | | PC人均顶会数 | | + | |
- | | ----------- | ------------ | | + | |
- | | NDSS | 11.59 | | + | |
- | | IEEE S& | + | |
- | | ACSAC | 8.09 | | + | |
- | | USENIX Sec | 7.91 | | + | |
- | | ACM CCS | 7.87 | | + | |
- | | DIMVA | 7.16 | | + | |
- | | RAID | 7.04 | | + | |
- | | ACM Wisec | 6.59 | | + | |
- | | ACM CODASPY | 5.79 | | + | |
- | | SecureComm | + | |
- | | PETS | 4.94 | | + | |
- | | Euro S& | + | |
- | | ACNS | 4.30 | | + | |
- | | ACM AsiaCCS | 4.26 | | + | |
- | | ICICS | 4.25 | | + | |
- | | ISC | 4.19 | | + | |
- | | ESORICS | + | |
- | | SOUPS | 2.72 | | + | |
- | | CANS | 1.93 | | + | |
- | | ACM SACMAT | + | |
- | | DSN | 1.85 | | + | |
- | | NSS | 1.21 | | + | |
- | | Inscrypt | + | |
- | | ISPEC | 0.69 | | + | |
- | | SRDS | 0.26 | | + | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | ## 录用论文认可度 | + | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | > 录用论文认可度:录用论文数目除以程序委员会的人数,再乘以程序委员会的人均顶会论文数目 | + | |
- | + | ||
- | 和去年相比,在这项指标中,我们发现,IEEE S& | + | |
- | + | ||
- | | | 录用论文认可度 | | + | |
- | | ----------- | ------------ | | + | |
- | | USENIX Sec | 11.43 | | + | |
- | | NDSS | 10.48 | | + | |
- | | IEEE S& | + | |
- | | Euro S& | + | |
- | | RAID | 5.25 | | + | |
- | | ACM CCS | 4.01 | | + | |
- | | ACM WiSec | 3.11 | | + | |
- | | ACSAC | 2.98 | | + | |
- | | ISC | 2.89 | | + | |
- | | ACNS | 2.85 | | + | |
- | | ACM CODASPY | + | |
- | | ACM AsiaCCS | + | |
- | | ESORICS | + | |
- | | SecureComm | + | |
- | | DIMVA | 1.76 | | + | |
- | | SOUPS | 1.73 | | + | |
- | | ICICS | 1.65 | | + | |
- | | ACM SACMAT | + | |
- | | CANS | 1.12 | | + | |
- | | DSN | 0.83 | | + | |
- | | PETS | 0.76 | | + | |
- | | ISPEC | 0.50 | | + | |
- | | Inscrypt | + | |
- | | NSS | 0.35 | | + | |
- | | SRDS | 0.14 | | + | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | ## 论文录用难度 | + | |
- | + | ||
- | > 论文录用难度:程序委员会的人均顶会论文数目除以该会议的论文录用率(录用率低,表示录用难度大,如果是同样的录用率,程序委员会的学术活跃度越高,说明录用论文更为受到安全社区的关注) | + | |
- | + | ||
- | 接下来是2022年各家会议的论文录用难度的评比。和去年一样,在这项指标上,ACM AsiaCCS继续取代ACM CCS,打破传统的四大安全会议的垄断(看起来四大安全会议的位置越来越不稳固,这也是我们希望看到的,不能总是那几支队伍去踢欧冠对吧~)。 | + | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | | | 论文录用难度 | | + | |
- | | ----------- | ------------ | | + | |
- | | NDSS | 70.77 | | + | |
- | | IEEE S& | + | |
- | | ACM CCS | 40.92 | | + | |
- | | ACSAC | 33.73 | | + | |
- | | RAID | 29.99 | | + | |
- | | USENIX Sec | 27.07 | + | |
- | | ACM WiSec | 25.97 | | + | |
- | | ACM AsiaCCS | 24.70 | | + | |
- | | DIMVA | 23.68 | | + | |
- | | ACNS | 21.34 | | + | |
- | | ICICS | 20.28 | | + | |
- | | PETS | 19.39 | | + | |
- | | ESORICS | + | |
- | | ISC | 14.16 | | + | |
- | | Euro S& | + | |
- | | SOUPS | 12.12 | | + | |
- | | DSN | 9.45 | | + | |
- | | ACM SACMAT | + | |
- | | CANS | 4.17 | | + | |
- | | NSS | 3.69 | | + | |
- | | Inscrypt | + | |
- | | ISPEC | 1.58 | | + | |
- | | ACM CODASPY | --- | | + | |
- | | SecureComm | + | |
- | | SRDS | --- | | + | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | ## 综合排名 | + | |
- | + | ||
- | > 学术社群热力度:投稿数目除以程序委员会人数,再乘以程序委员会的人均顶会论文数目 | + | |
- | + | ||
- | 最后我们终于到了揭晓今年总成绩的时候啦,在赛季末的排名中,CCS和AsiaCCS这两个ACM旗下的会议相爱相杀,两者排名和去年相比发生了交换。ACM AsiaCCS首次在年终冲击前四成功(这很阿森纳!),恭喜! | + | |
- | + | ||
- | 同时,我们继续将所有会议分为甲乙组,由于去年已经进行了这样的划分,我们可以看看今年的升降级情况: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | | | 综合排名 | | + | |
- | | ----------- | -------- | | + | |
- | | NDSS | 63.97 | | + | |
- | | IEEE S& | + | |
- | | USENIX Sec | 39.12 | | + | |
- | | RAID | 22.38 | | + | |
- | | ACM CCS | 20.86 | | + | |
- | | Euro S& | + | |
- | | ACM AsiaCCS | 14.28 | | + | |
- | | ACNS | 14.14 | | + | |
- | | ACSAC | 12.44 | | + | |
- | | ACM WiSec | 12.26 | | + | |
- | | ESORICS | + | |
- | | ISC | 9.78 | | + | |
- | | ICICS | 7.90 | | + | |
- | | SOUPS | 7.69 | | + | |
- | | DIMVA | 5.81 | | + | |
- | | ACM SACMAT | + | |
- | | DSN | 4.23 | | + | |
- | | PETS | 2.99 | | + | |
- | | Inscrypt | + | |
- | | CANS | 2.42 | | + | |
- | | ISPEC | 1.15 | | + | |
- | | NSS | 1.06 | | + | |
- | | ACM CODASPY | --- | | + | |
- | | SecureComm | + | |
- | | SRDS | --- | | + |